Grading Packers mock drafts made by fans, here are the top 3 outcomes for Green Bay in the 2026 NFL Draft
The A to Z Sports mock draft simulator tool allows fans to have the perfect pre-draft experience, and some Packers followers took full advantage of it to build their perfect classes.
Last week, A to Z Sports launched its fantastic NFL Mock Draft Simulator — you should absolutely check this one out. So we went on social media and asked for fans to send their mocks. Now, we’re grading some of these mocks and see which outcome could be the best for the Green Bay Packers.
Defensive tackle at the top, weak offensive line
Jay gets another Georgia defensive tackle to pair with Devonte Wyatt, which Brian Gutekunst would likely approve. Christen Miller isn’t the best interior rusher, but without a doubt he adds an element the current group doesn’t have with his ability to occupy blocks and stop the run. The next three players — Everette, Lance, and Capehart, I’ve taken them all in different mocks this offseason. I just don’t give you an A because the offensive line would ideally be addressed before the seventh round — probably in the fifth, instead of taking a second interior defensive lineman.
Grade: B
Team trade down
I’ve found a trade down madman just like myself. Freets here makes three consecutive trades from 52 to 73, adding massive draft capital and still selecting Julian Neal in the process. I love that. Moore is probably undersized based on the Packers’ preferences, but getting three offensive linemen would be a very Packers-y move.
Grade: A
Positional value nightmare
Look, Curdheads, you got some players I do like — Capehart and Skyler Gill-Howard, in particular. Emmanuel Pregnon’s tape is fantastic, so I’ll give you that too. But taking a guard and a running back with your first two draft picks is tough. Even if they are good, the impact will inevitably be limited — even though it would open the door for getting rid of a guy like Aaron Banks in a year.
Grade: C
Defense-heavy class
I like Height a lot, even though we shall see if he’s a Packers-type. Doubling down on cornerbacks is a smart strategy. The one thing I don’t love, once again, is the lack of investment in the offensive line — I’d probably not take Dallen Bentley at that point.
Grade: B
Premium positional value
Matt does a great job here getting players from high positional value early, taking two cornerbacks and one edge defender — even though, as previously mentioned, Moore might not be the ideal physical type. Defense was obviously the focus here, but the lack of offensive line picks is again an issue.
Grade: B
Varied group of players
Kalani got the Packers a true nose tackle for the Packers, which would be risky in terms of value for the first pick of the class. However, that comes after a trade down, which makes more sense. The problem is a lack of high-end talent here, but Everette and Zuhn would be solid fits for what the roster needs.
Grade: B
Green Bay Packers News
Packers fix multiple weaknesses in latest 7-round mock draft and the full plan increasingly feels too good to ignore
Draft is always the most important path for the Packers to build the roster, and this scenario would solve some mid- and long-term issues on the roster, including replacing players lost this offseason.
