ESPN throws Hunter Renfrow’s hat into the ring as free agent solution for Steelers WR room

While the Pittsburgh Steelers may still have a few tricks up their sleeve when it comes to acquiring a WR, finding one on the open market is no longer Pittsburgh’s best option.  But according to ESPN, the Steelers can fill the void with a former Pro Bowler.  And while that sounds good on paper, here's […]

Rob Gregson NFL News Writer
Add as preferred source on Google
Dec 24, 2022; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Las Vegas Raiders wide receiver Hunter Renfrow (13) returns a punt against Pittsburgh Steelers long snapper Christian Kuntz (46) and linebacker Marcus Allen (27) during the third quarter at Acrisure Stadium. The Steelers won 13-10. Mandatory Credit: Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports
Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports

While the Pittsburgh Steelers may still have a few tricks up their sleeve when it comes to acquiring a WR, finding one on the open market is no longer Pittsburgh’s best option. 

But according to ESPN, the Steelers can fill the void with a former Pro Bowler. 

And while that sounds good on paper, here's why it's not a smart move: 

No to Renfrow

Diontae Johnson has been traded to the Panthers, and while the Steelers signed Van Jefferson, the former Rams wideout hasn't been effective for most of his pro career. Renfrow would compete with Calvin Austin for reps as the team's third receiver and return man. -Bill Barnwell, ESPN

While I understand the rationale behind Barnwell's thinking, paying extra money to a player who will do what Calvin Austin does at the same, if not worse level just doesn't make sense to me. 

Sure, Renfrow's best season is miles ahead of what Austin has shown, but no matter which way you slice it, we're talking about a competition for the WR #3 spot at best, but likely the fourth spot if and when Pittsburgh makes a blockbuster trade, and or drafts a WR within the first three rounds. 

So maybe we're arguing semantics, but I don't see the value and believe Pittsburgh would be better off with money spent elsewhere.