The Detroit Lions quarterback debate that never seems to die got another round of fuel this week. Jared Goff or Jordan Love? If you ask the analytics crowd, it’s Love. If you ask the NFL’s coaches, executives, and players, it’s Goff. And once again, ESPN’s annual rankings side with the people who actually play and coach the game.

I recently participated in an all-NFC North team debate with our beat writers who cover the rest of the NFC North, and I took Goff. The other three took Love. Their reasoning leaned heavily on EPA and similar advanced metrics. Look, EPA is important. I’m not dismissing it. But it requires critical context that people routinely ignore. EPA favors the quarterback who throws deep, and Goff isn’t asked to do that in Detroit’s offense. He doesn’t need to. That doesn’t make him worse. It makes the metric incomplete without proper framing.

Here’s the thing, though. If the Lions are truly trying to throw deep more often with Mike Kafka and Drew Petzing calling the shots, I think you’re going to see a shift in those numbers. Goff’s EPA could look completely different by the end of 2026.

What ESPN’s coaches and executives had to say

ESPN’s latest evaluation of Goff is telling. Goff’s last two seasons stack up well against almost any quarterback. Over that span, he threw for 9,193 yards and 71 touchdowns. Only four quarterbacks have had more 4,500-yard passing seasons than Goff’s five: Drew Brees, Tom Brady, Matt Ryan, and Peyton Manning. That’s elite company.

“The guy wins,” an NFL coordinator said. “He’s going to find a completion if not under pressure, mature pocket passer with a plus arm who can layer the ball at all levels.”

Goff appeared on nearly 60% of ballots to earn a spot in the top 10. The NFL 100 rankings are ongoing right now, and I would guarantee Goff lands ahead of Love there too. The people who game-plan against him see it clearly.

The pressure argument doesn’t hold up the way you think it does

The biggest knock on Goff has always been his play under pressure. He took a career-high 38 sacks in 2025, and the pocket-collapse criticism follows him everywhere. But the actual numbers tell a different story.

From 2023 to 2025, Goff was pressured 700 times compared to Love’s 550. Love has a better average time to throw at 2.7 seconds versus Goff’s 2.56 seconds. Love is more mobile, which helps him avoid sacks. That’s fair, and I’ll give him that without any qualms.

But under pressure during that same span, Goff completed 52.7% of his passes with nine touchdowns, seven interceptions, and 18 turnover-worthy plays. Love completed 46.1% with seven touchdowns, 12 interceptions, and 16 turnover-worthy plays. I’m not penalizing Goff for two additional turnover-worthy plays while ignoring the fact that he threw five fewer interceptions and completed passes at a 6% higher rate under duress. The math doesn’t support the idea that Goff is bad under pressure. He just doesn’t avoid sacks well. There’s a difference.

Goff against winning teams, and the Washington game everyone misremembers

Goff is better against winning teams. That’s been the knock on Love his entire career. When the Packers need a win against a good opponent or have to perform in a high-leverage moment, Love struggles. I’m not making it up. Look it up.

Some people point to the Washington game as evidence against Goff, but that’s probably the most misunderstood game of his career. Two of his interceptions came as desperation heaves at the end of halves. One was legitimately bad. And somehow Goff still gets blamed for an interception that Jameson Williams threw. The context matters, and people refuse to examine it.

The NFL’s players, coaches, and executives see what I see. The media tends to see what the analytics tell them to see without digging into the surrounding context. Goff is the better quarterback. The people who play against him, coach against him, and build their teams around trying to beat him agree with that. You make your decision on who you trust more.

Detroit Lions News

We built the Dan Campbell Trust Index using five years of Lions rookie data. Here’s what it says about the 2026 class

Mike Payton July 8, 2026