Vikings NFL Draft Preview: Bold predictions among Minnesota’s fanbase paint an incredibly bright future
How the Minnesota Vikings should and will approach the NFL Draft has been a topic of heavy debate over the course of the entire offseason, and the fanbase gives its bold predictions.
We are just eight days away from the NFL Draft, and how the Minnesota Vikings will approach it has been the topic of discussion among the fanbase for months.
The debates have mainly focused on how the Vikings will attack the defensive side of the football. Is cornerback the right approach? Would they take a safety who compares to Harrison Smith? Could there be a defensive tackle worth taking at No. 18?
With there being such a short time until the NFL Draft is set to begin, everybody has their own opinions on what will happen. I asked Vikings fans about their biggest bold predictions.
Vikings will trade down
This is a really interesting one. This class isn’t loaded with high-end players, but there are a multitude of starting level players throughout day two. Making a big trade down makes a lot of sense for the Vikings. What would they have to get back to be worth it? I wrote about it earlier in March, and the Rich Hill trade chart provides a historical baseline.
| Team | Capital Given Up | Value | Capital Received | Value |
| Panthers | 18 | 287 | 19, 159 | 288 |
| Cowboys | 18 | 287 | 20, 112 | 298 |
| Steelers | 18 | 287 | 21, 121, 224 | 288 |
| Chargers | 18 | 287 | 22, 86 | 302 |
| Eagles | 18 | 287 | 23, 98, 153 | 293 |
| Browns | 18, 234 | 289 | 24, 70 | 307 |
| Bears | 18, 234 | 289 | 25, 60 | 308 |
| Bills | 18 | 287 | 26, 91, 2027 3rd | 293 |
| 49ers | 18 | 287 | 27, 139, 2027 2nd | 287 |
| Texans | 18 | 287 | 28, 59, 106 | 300 |
| Chiefs | 18, 82 | 337 | 29, 40 | 351 |
| Dolphins | 18, 234 | 289 | 30, 75, 94 | 300 |
| Patriots | 18 | 287 | 31, 63, 131 | 290 |
| Seahawks | 18, 165 | 197 | 32, 64, 96 | 303 |
Vikings take a wide receiver early
This isn’t as crazy of an idea as you might think. The Athletic’s Alec Lewis noted that the Vikings have done a lot of work on this wide receiver class, with wide receivers coach Keenan McCardell putting in a lot of miles. Round one might be a little bit of a stretch for the Vikings considering their needs and already having Jordan Addison and Justin Jefferson in the top two spots, but it’s a very important position to have a lot of talent at.
Who could the Vikings take? The best fit is arguably KC Concepcion from Texas A&M. His profile is excellent, with explosive route running and excellent YAC ability. He would give the Vikings another player to maximize across the formation, and someone who can win after the catch, which is something they need.
Minnesota goes offensive line in round one
This would be a fascinating idea for the Vikings, and one that could have merit. Last year, the biggest issue for Kevin O’Connell’s offense wasn’t the quarterback play, it was the injuries on the offensive line. Christian Darrisaw and Brian O’Neill both missed multiple games throughout the 2025 season.
They need to have more depth at offensive tackle, and they added Ryan Van Demark as their swing tackle. Even so, Darrisaw has yet to play an entire season in his five years with the team, and O’Neill has been more often injured.
Does that make taking an offensive tackle in round one worth it? On the surface, no it doesn’t. However, there are levels to the entire discussion. The Vikings may have an extension budgeted for O’Neill, but his contract does expire after the season. Selecting one would give the Vikings insurance for the 2026 season, and a long-term answer for 2027 and beyond.
Is Proctor that player? The former five-star recruit is a mammoth of a man. He is 350-plus pounds with decent movement skills, but has struggled to stay consistent. It would be a massive upside play for the Vikings, and one that could pay off. The Vikings might not even have the chance to select him, as there have been discussions about him going as high as sixth overall.
Vikings trade up for a…tight end?
Now this is a spicy take I can get behind. Trading up would be expensive for a team that needs to build up their depth on both sides of the ball, but for a player you think could transform the offense, it might be worth it.
Just like I did for trading down, I wrote about the bevy of options to trade up.
| Team | Capital Given Up | Value | Capital Received | Value |
| Chiefs | 18, 49 | 405 | 9 | 387 |
| Bengals | 18, 82, 97 | 379 | 10 | 369 |
| Dolphins | 18, 49 | 405 | 11, 94 | 399 |
| Cowboys | 18, 82, 163 | 351 | 12 | 347 |
| Rams | 18, 82 | 341 | 13 | 336 |
| Ravens | 18, 97 | 325 | 14 | 325 |
| Buccaneers | 18, 97 | 325 | 15, 155 | 326 |
| Jets | 18, 97 | 325 | 16, 140 | 320 |
| Lions | 18, 163 | 297 | 17 | 296 |
Would giving up a day two pick, which was something the Vikings did way too often under Kwesi Adofo-Mensah, be the right play to get a player like Kenyon Sadiq? That will be up to interpretation. However, it would be a major signal that the Vikings believe he can transform Kevin O’Connell’s offense.

Production over traits
There was a report from Matt Miller of ESPN that stated the Vikings were looking to pick players on day two who had good production profiles. Here’s the misnomer about production: it doesn’t translate like you think it does.
Some of the most productive players in the history of college football didn’t translate at all to the NFL. There has to be a balance between traits and production to project how well someone translates.
Taking a player who has traits that were also productive is a good idea. However, only going based on production is how you end up selecting busts. Will the Vikings do what Miller reported? Time will tell on that, but it shouldn’t be solely based on production.
