Bears Trade Rumors: Blowing out the smoke on what ‘aggressive’ will look like in Chicago as Ryan Poles considers his options
The Chicago Bears continue to be mentioned as a team that will be aggressive in making a move before the NFL trade deadline, but we need to set some realistic guardrails on what to expect.
The Chicago Bears have been the talk of the town over the last 24-48 hours with the NFL trade deadline creeping closer and closer to Nov. 10. Those rumors continued to circle in on Monday to the point where we need to finally take this serious.
Multiple national insiders have now mentioned the Chicago Bears as a team that many expect to make a move via trade. ESPN’s Adam Schefter was hinting around the name Khalil Mack, as was Ian Rapoport. FOX Sports’ Jay Glazer said that the Bears would be an aggressive team. And Jordan Schultz noted the Bears are connected to several defensive players, want to be aggressive, and he wouldn’t be shocked if they made a move.
So, let’s break down what we should expect because all of the insiders are hinting toward the Bears making some kind of move.
What do the Chicago Bears need?
Let’s start here. The Bears have a couple of needs on the defensive side of the ball and one potential need on the offensive side of the ball, so let’s talk about it.
First of all, edge rusher is the big name. The Bears have Montez Sweat coming back this week after serving his two-game suspension. In his absence, Austin Booker and Daniel Hardy filled in alongside Shemar Turner and Jamree Kromah who mixed in. Even with Sweat back, that’s not a deep room in terms of talent. And consistency has been a major concern this season for Sweat and Booker. So, the Bears could use a starter there.
On the interior, veteran Grady Jarrett has taken a noticeable step and the Bears had really strong play from Dayo Odeyingbo before placing him on the IR. With Odeyingbo sidelined, Kentavius Street has filled in with Jordan van den Berg and Neville Gallimore filling in. It’s worth noting that the Bears shipped off Gervon Dexter Sr. back in August because the coaching staff felt confident about the depth at this position. That depth hasn’t really shown itself through seven games and the Bears would need a long-term answer here beyond 2026.
And then we have corner. Jaylon Johnson has been abysmal this season, both in coverage and as a tackler. He’s clearly shown decline coming back from his 2025 injury. Tyrique Stevenson is a coverage liability as well and in the final year of his contract. Getting Kyler Gordon back was a major boost for this unit, but he’s best-suited in the slot. His return, though, did allow the Bears to move rookie Malik Muhammad II back outside. However, Muhammad suffered an injury on Thursday night that we still don’t know the extent of. In the Dexter trade, the Bears acquired Clark Phillips III, who’s seen action the last two weeks, but not enough to consider him a starting option.
On offense, the only position worth mentioning is tight end after losing Cole Kmet to a season-ending injury. But, even then, the Bears have Colston Loveland and Sam Roush along with two practice squad options that already know this complicated offense. And I see the Bears using more jumbo-TE looks with an extra tackle now that Ozzy Trapilo is back in action.
What can the Bears financially afford?
This is where things really start to get complicated here. As things stand, the Bears currently have $9,214,359 in available cap space. That’s basically only $4.2 million to work with considering teams generally want to keep $5 million in cap space through the season.
So, the idea of adding top-end players wouldn’t be possible financially, UNLESS the Bears get the trading team to eat some of the 2026 cap hit or restructure the deal (or other deals already on the books). I don’t think the latter is something the Bears would want to do to avoid dirtying up the cap in 2027. The former would require sending a higher draft pick in return (more on that later).
Just for context, here’s how the Bears’ cap space would look based on a few top names that have been floated around.
- Khalil Mack – $4.9 million hit would leave the Bears with around $4.3 million
- DeForest Buckner – $7.9 million hit would leave the Bears with around $1.3 million
- Josh Sweat – $6.6 million hit would leave the Bears with around $2.6 million
- Maxx Crosby – $18.8 million hit would cause the Bears be $9.6 million OVER
- Jeffery Simmons – $7.9 million hit would leave the Bears with around $1.3 million
So, Mack would make sense from a financial standpoint. Sweat could be possible. Bucker and Simmons would require some work to make it happen. And Crosby, there’s no shot without seriously reworking multiple deals.
What would the Bears be willing to give up
This is the other kicker here. Teams aren’t just throwing away good players for peanuts. For this part of the conversation, I go back to what general manager Ryan Poles said when the team was considering making a move for Maxx Crosby a few months back.
“Just constantly looking at short-term, long-term,” Poles said. “What’s going to help this football team now? But also being conscious of what’s going to happen down the road. We want to sustain success. In order to do that, we have to be very calculated with the moves we make.”
With how this team is built, the Bears aren’t in a position to be throwing around premium draft picks for veterans (i.e. Crosby or Simmons). Poles and Johnson want to build long-term success and build from within. So, anything above a third-round pick is off the table in my eyes.
My honest expectations for the Bears at the deadline
My thoughts right now are that Ryan Poles is calling around about a few different options. The two I keep circling back toward is a “splash” trade to get DeForest Buckner (cost of a third-round pick) OR being conservative and sending a Day 3 pick for Khalil Mack (cost of a fourth/fifth-round pick) and a some help at cornerback (Nahshon Wright + a seventh for a sixth).
The only thing that concerns me with Option A is that the 49ers also seem interested in Buckner and that could drive up the price even higher. Option B is the best course of action. It might not be splashy or aggressive as fans would like, but it’s realistic and that’s what we have to be here. And for what it’s worth, I would be floored to have Mack back in Chicago and add help at cornerback if you could pull off both moves.

